Welcome to the WCC on-line mentoring program. Our goal here is to give you the opportunity to interact with members of the scientific community by posing career questions to volunteer mentors from a variety of backgrounds and experiences. We hope that this program will be a valuable piece of your overall mentoring network.
First you will see links to information on mentoring itself, which can get you started on developing a mentoring network or improving upon the one you already have. There is also a link to the WCC Career Chat program where periodically scientists and engineers will share information on their careers and experiences in a non-interactive manner. This includes articles from the WCC newsletter series on Successful Women as well.
We've included a link to MentorNet, currently headquartered at San Jose State University in San Jose, California, which is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization working to further women's progress in scientific and technical fields through the use of a dynamic, technology-supported mentoring program. MentorNet aims to advance women and society, and enhance engineering and related sciences, by promoting a diversified, expanded and talented workforce. In partnership with colleges and universities, corporations, government labs and agencies and professional societies, MentorNet is international in scope, serving students and professionals from all over the world. Major funding is provided by Alcoa Foundation, AT&T Foundation, IBM, the National Science Foundation, Cisco Systems, and Symantec.
Next you will see links to the on-line mentors themselves. You may read the short biographies provided for each mentor and find the one whose experiences you feel would be most beneficial in answering your questions. Within each mini-biography, there is an e-mail link to that mentor. Once a mentor receives a question from you, they will reply directly to you with an answer. Then both the question and answer may be edited, to provide confidentiality, and posted in our FAQ section below.
| General Mentoring Info | WCC Mentoring Articles | "On-line" Mentoring Q&A | |
| MentorNet at San Jose State University | Wall Street Journal Article | Career Chat | Non-traditional careers and transition periods |
| Cook Ross, mentoring consulting firm | Successful Women Chemists Articles from WCC Newsletters | Starting a career | |
| ACS Office of Minority Affairs, contact Stephanie Butler | Mentoring: The Buzzword for the 90's (or How Do I Find One?) From a WCC newsletter | Returning to Chemistry? | |
| Not-for-profit |
Dawn Brooks, PhD. received her doctorate in organic chemistry from Indiana University in 1998 and joined Eli Lilly and Company that year as a senior organic chemist where she focused on the design and synthesis of agents for the treatment of Type II diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. In 2002, Dr. Brooks became the research manager for the Chemical Product R&D organization at Lilly before accepting an assignment in January, 2005 to focus full-time on company-wide process improvements projects by becoming a Six Sigma Black Belt. Throughout her career, Dr. Brooks has demonstrated an ability to collaborate effectively across functions and alliances, while maintaining a strong presence in the chemistry community through publications, patents, invited lectures and active committee work for the American Chemical Society. Please e-mail her at BROOKS_DAWN_A@lilly.com.
Janet Bryant a B.S. chemist (Elmhurst College 1980) with an M.B.A. (University of WA 1987), has over 25 years experience in performing and managing contract R&D of engineered and organizational systems. After a decade-long concentration on environmental and waste management policy and issue analysis, environmental assessments and analyses, and waste site remediation and environmental restoration, she has turned her focus to optimization and deployment of homeland security detection systems. As a Grade IV Scientist/Engineer at the Dept. of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, she is active at local, regional and national levels of ACS and is currently Program Chair for the Division of Business Development and Management (BMGT), and the WCC webmaster. Janet has a particular affinity for expanding the “face of chemistry” to include both traditional and nontraditional paths, and for “de-mystifying” chemistry for the general public. If you have career questions that you think Janet might be able to answer, please e-mail her at janetlbryant@pnl.gov.
Rita Majerle obtained her BS with majors in chemistry and biology and went to work in industry for five years as a bench chemist. She returned to school to get her PhD from the University of Minnesota where she was trained as a synthetic organic chemist. After a postdoctoral stint at the University of California, Irvine, she became an academician and mother. Currently she is an associate professor of chemistry at Hamline University, a small liberal arts college in Minnesota. Rita has published and presented numerous articles and is a contributor to the ACS book “Successful Women in Chemistry”. She precariously balances her career and her personal life as a wife and mother of three. most recently obtained her level three coaching certificate in hockey. If you have career questions that you think Rita might be able to answer, please e-mail her at rmajerle01@gw.hamline.edu.
Below are some frequently asked questions and answers from this on-line mentoring program that might be beneficial to a wider audience.
=================================Mentoring Activities for 2005
Hi Jody,
Thank you so much for the
thoughful replies from you and your colleague. This whole issue has been
tearing at me for a few years now, and I had pretty much given up on being able
to have both a family and a research career. Realizing that I can have both has
been a very liberating experience.
It was also encouraging to hear
that lab safety is much better in industry, to
the point that I would actually
be able to work while pregnant. Considering
your advice, I am going to
pursue a postdoc with a professor here and also an industrial postdoc with a
startup synthesis company in town. My husband and I are still hoping to start a
family soon, but at least now I am doing what I love so it is not as big of a
deal if it takes a while to get pregnant.
Thanks again for your advice -
it has been a huge help and encouragement!
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Thanks for writing.
In today's job market, post-docs
are a highly desirable and often a required experience. You might consider trying to secure an
industrial position without a post-doc as this might allow you to 'pull' you
husband in to your employer a couple years down the road. If you do pursue the post-doc, I would
say that you don't necessarily need to leave the lab if you become
pregnant. That would be your
personal choice and in fact at so companies (Lilly and Lubrizol for example);
their female scientists often stay in the lab throughout their pregnancy. In an industrial setting, the upmost
precautions are taken in an organic lab to ensure that the hoods have strong
air flow and
You could take respirator
training as a further precaution.
And you would never be ask to use a chemical you were not comfortable
using. All that being said, since
post-doc positions are only about 18 months, perhaps the best timing may be
after the post-doc and once you secure full-time employment. Good benefits are what you are looking
for!
Jody
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi Jody,
I found your bio online and
thought you might be able to offer some advice on a career question I
have. I will be graduating with my
PhD in chemistry (organic) from the
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Hello again.
Thank you so much for writing
back. Your email was a big help. I am just starting to search as I won't
be graduating until May 2006 but wanted to get a feel for my options. I
like the sounds of your managering position.
Can one be hired directly as a
manager or move quickly from the bench to the office? I would say it is good to start at the bench
to get a feel for the company.
I was also wondering about
hours. Is industry really a 9-5 job or should I just get used to the idea
of working odd hours and weekends? I
work from 7-4 and we can flex our time. No weekends! I do travel,
but I work around this with my husband.
Do you have a family? Yes. I have been married for 13 years
and have a 7 year old son.
Is it hard to find time
for them? Yes/no. I would
love to spend 24/7 with them, but I get home at
What are the policies for
pregnant women or does that depend on the company?Depends on the company. Lubrizol is very good 6 wks paid off and
3 months family leave. Currently one of our formulators is on maternity
leave. Also there are policies in place that if you are working at the
bench you don't have to expose yourself to chemicals during your term.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
"Kocsis, Jody"
<JAKO@Lubrizol.com> wrote:
projects involving motor oil
additives. I evaluate PCMO new components for the Engine Oil Product
Development Group and contribute new ideas and technology for future motor oil
upgrades. As a technology manager, I develop structure-performance
fundamental knowledge of components in regards to engine design. I lead
teams having members form different R&D departments (Chemical Synthesis,
Engine Test Lab, Pilot Plant, manufacturing, etc). I make recommendations
which impact the motor oil business with our oil marketers and OEM (Original
Equipment Manufacturers).
I have been with Lubrizol 16
years of which 11 were spent on the bench developing new detergents for motor
oils. I then was promoted to an engine oil formulator. I formulate
various additives: detergents, dispersants, antifoam, antiwear additives,
friction modifiers, etc. Based on the combination of the type of
additives, you can achieve different performances. Our Engine Oil Product
Development Group has 15 chemists of which come from various educational
backgrounds and cultures. For a formulating career, it is a must you have
a chemistry background, good communication skills, a leader and able to
multitask! I thoroughly enjoy my work and the people I work with.
You probably ask, why or how did I choose this career? Well, since
I started from the bench, I could take a look at Lubrizol's product lines and
make a decision on where I wanted to go in the company, be it marketing,
R&D management, formulating, etc. Several companies have
"formulating" position, one that is most popular is the personal care
industry (P&G comes to mind).
One of the sources I used in
trying to determine what I wanted to do after my education was annual reports.
They tend to give you a flavor of what a company does and its culture.
Jody Kocsis
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Ms. Kocsis,
I am a graduate student at
___________________________________________________________________________________________
I did a postdoc for one year for
fun and a chance to move cross country in a nonpermanent way. I worked at
As for the timing of children,
waiting until after 30 is great, but I can understand not wanting to wait
too. I say 'Hells bells, if you want kids, just have them and fit them
in. It'll work itself out in the end.' And working in the lab, I
don't see an issue with working while pregnant. At Dow, everyone should
be safe and working in a safe manor, period. I did see a Dow physician to
discuss working with chemicals while pregnant and got some good
information. I had a list of all the chemicals that I thought I would
work with during this time and they looked up the specific knowledge about
pregnancy related to these chemicals. Not surprisingly there wasn't much
published info on some and this is because of the 95,000+ chemicals listed,
only about 5,000 have been tested. We use personal protective equipment
and work in hoods, etc. Again, the safety is the same whether pregnant or
not. If this person works as a postdoc at a university and is pregnant I
would suggest she pursue this safety on her own. Universities aren't
known for their great lab safety programs.
When interviewing, she doesn't
need to nor should she disclose information about wanting children. She
shouldn't even disclose that she is married. It is against the law for
the employer to ask, but I'm sure the ring is the outward sign that she
is. I would be surprised if the employer cared about the marital status
though. They may be more interested to find out about the husband and
potentially getting two folks to employ.
Finally, has she thought about a
postdoc and then having a child between the postdoc and permanent
position? This might allow her time off without feeling guilty about
leaving projects/employers with a gap of workers. Just a thought.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
I did not do a post-doc either.
Although in today's job market, they are a highly desirable and often a
required experience. She might consider trying to secure a industrial
position without a post-doc as this might allow her to 'pull' her husband in to
her employee a couple years down the road. If she does pursue the
post-doc, I would say that she doesn't necessarily need to leave the lab if she
becomes pregnant. That would be her personal choice and in fact at Lilly,
our female scientists often stay in the lab throughout their pregnancy.
In an industrial setting, the upmost precautions are taken in an organic
lab to ensure that the hoods have strong air flow and she could take respirator
training as a further precaution. And she would never be ask to use a
chemical she was not comfortable using. All that being said, since the
post-doc position are only about 18 months, perhaps the best timing may be
after the post-doc and once she secures full-time employment. Better
benefits! I can personally vouch for the joys of starting motherhood
after age 30...
Dawn
I received my Ph.D. in chemistry in 1987, after which I worked in industry for 7.5 years and decided that 'that' life was not for me. I wanted to DO something for others, I was sick of the politics and very sick of the 50-70 hr. work week. Sound familiar to either of you? I then landed a position at a university and worked there as an assistant prof. of chemistry for 4 years. My scholarly activity was in science education which allowed me to go into the community a lot, working with teachers and doing demonstrations for entire schools. I loved that aspect of my job as well as teaching. However, after four years, I came up for mid-tenure review and was blown away by some very sticky politics from my peers. I decided to leave, again. I am currently on a leave of absence from the university until May.
While I have truly enjoyed my 7 months off (I have two children as well as a husband who works in industry) I am trying to decide what to do with my life/career. I can't help but wonder if there are others out there who find themselves in similar transitional periods? Are there options for non-traditional careers? Are women (and men) having the same trouble as I have had making choices and 'dealing' with politics? Is there a way we can counsel young people just getting their Ph.D.s? Is there a book of stories about people who made changes in careers? Can we counsel people on how to deal with the never ending 'politics' inherent in any position? Are there questions people can ask when interviewing to help probe how people get along? At this point, I've considered a variety of jobs that would not even use my science background and I think that is a waste.
Just thought I'd pose a few of my questions and see if you have any insight or knowledge of others in this situation. Thanks for your time in reading this.
One set of Answers:
The questions you ask are definitely ones that we have heard from other professionals and are ourselves asking as well. In fact, one of the goals for my subcommittee is to research alternative career paths for chemists; with the intent of providing information through our newsletter, our website and seminars being offered at national meetings. While this is a relatively new project for us, we did feature an excellent speaker at one of our recent seminars who spoke on Women Chemists in Chemical Sales. This job often comes with beneficial perks such as setting your own hours, working out of the house, a good bonus system, etc. The demand is high right now as well. This is one alternative pathway. I am sure our speaker would be happy to hear from you, if you are interested in this line of work. I will forward you her contact information soon.
We are pursuing other alternatives as well, some of which may be in industry but are non-traditional within that realm. For example, one PhD chemist at my company is working in the finance department right now, handling funding for major projects. Her chemical knowledge is used to ensure that all aspects of the project are being adequately covered and that funding is not cut by someone who wouldn't realize the importance or understand perhaps pieces of the project. Another high-demand area right now is for experienced scientists to audit and certify various laboratories and chemical plants. With the big boom of far-reaching quality standards such as ISO and AALA, audit companies are searching for qualified individuals who have the chemical knowledge required to assess the quality or safety needs of a variety of processes. These jobs typically allow you to live wherever you want, schedule audits according to your timeframe and preferred locals and pay very well. However they often involve extensive traveling.
Question:
I received the WCC newsletter
which prompted me to check out the website. I am young and still
trying to figure out exactly what I want to do. I have been thinking
that I would like to work for a pharmaceutical company. I currently
have a BA and have spent the last two years gathering different types of
experience. I worked in a QA dept for a cosmetics company and currently
am working as a research assistant. Will it be very difficult to
get my foot in the door?
Answer:
I believe that gathering different types of experience is always good.
In general, the types of things that will give you a leg up on the competition
so to speak are demonstrated communication skills (both speaking and writing),
proven leadership experience (either at work or in outside organizations),
a broad knowledge of the business, etc. In general, your scientific
skills will be taken for granted based on your educational and work credentials,
so new employers will be looking for those "extras" that make a superb
employee. You should always research the company and industry before
applying for work, in order to tailor your application. As far as getting your foot
in the door, that is exactly what you need to do. Most large pharmaceutical
companies will have many opportunities for transferring to different departments,
locations, etc. over time. Often taking a less than dream job may
yield further opportunities down the line. However, I feel it is
important to enjoy each job that you take as well. Of course, having
contacts and applying through the right avenues is the best way to get
your foot in the door. Registering with the ACS employment database
is a good start. Using your contacts through the University or professional
organizations to find contacts within a company is another good thing to
do. Then not only do you apply through the company's HR department,
but you can also send a personalized letter to a contact farther within
the given organization.
Returning to Chemistry?
Q: Dear Arlene:
I came across your background online on the Women in Chemistry site.
I was wondering if you could advise me on returning to the Chemistry line
of work. I am now based in India (since the start of this year) and am
not gaining too much career satisfaction in the line of work I am doing
now (technical recruitment). I always had an interest in Analytical Chem
though. My grades were As in that area too. I have attached my resume for
your perusal. Pls advise.
Warm regards, R.
A.: Dear R.:
Thanks for visiting the Women Chemists web site.
Analytical chemistry is a booming field and can only grow. The major
growth is due to environmental samples. It is really important to
have up-to-date skills and chromatography is the area of major job openings.
My suggestion would be to invest in a good short course. The combination
of your computer skills with a quick refresher in the tools should make
it easy to shift to an interesting position. Another approach would
be to associate with a temporary service. As you know, lots of companies
are hiring professionals through temporary services and then offering permanent
positions later. It is a newer trend in chemistry, and is now very
common in the northeast US and Texas. Those geographic areas are very strong
for analytical hiring.
Good luck with your efforts! Arlene
Not-for-profit
Q: Dear Dr. Arlene:
I found your name and email address from the WCC "on-line" Mentoring
program. Currently, I am negotiating for a staff research position with
a not-for-profit research organization. I would greatly appreciate
you if you could give me advice on how to negotiate for this position.
Many thanks.
D., Ph.D. chemist
A: Dear Dr. D.:
Great question! There are some similarities in position negotiation
regardless of the type of potential employer. Time spent preparing for
negotiation has a huge potential payback, and women have a strong tradition
of avoiding serious negotiation. Some studies say that negotiation is the
employment step that causes the largest portion of the salary differential
between men and women.
1) Do any research you can on pay for comparable jobs. If you are replacing
some one, find out what they were paid. Call folks at similar organizations.
Check the national statistics. Take all the numbers with you into any
session where you may find yourself negotiating.
2) Decide before you go in if you want the position at whatever cost,
or if you are willing to walk. Your ability to negotiate depends upon your
ability to walk away.
3) Get any information you can about the organization. Depending upon
how the organization is chartered, you may be able to get access to by-laws
and/or annual financial reports. The big thing to look for is the shut
down strategy. Most not-for-profits require assets to pass to a similar
group, and employment contracts are not always addressed. Ask about whether
polices exist that guarantee a specific notice for dismissal.
4) Not-for-profit organizations can have more flexibility in compensation
structure. Not necessary bigger pots of money, but they may be able to
work with you. For example, will you be responsible for bringing in grants?
Can you get an incentive structure involving pay increases for meeting
a particular grant income level? Or perhaps agreement in advance to fund
a support position when you bring in a million a year?
Good luck to you! Arlene
Followup Q:
Dear Arlene:
I would like to ask specific questions which are as follows:
1. The position was initially offered for a six month position, from
the first-step-negotiation, I now got a one year position. Is there
a room for further negotiation?
2. -will you be responsible for bringing in grants?
Yes. I must have to bring in grants in the expected time frame.
And my salary will be paid by my grants only, it means: no grants no salary.
My question now is how to negotiate for getting "something" to start?
Many thanks, D.
A: Dear D.:
More good questions!
It sounds like they have limited funds at the moment related to specific
grant, and a year may be the best you can do. What resources will you have
available for the work? If they have technicians, you want appropriate
technician time. You probably want access to the clerical folks for help
with your proposals (at least duplicating and sending). You may or may
not be able to get control of any actual budget funds at this. There are
probably some funds in the current grant, but they
probably won't put you in charge of those.
This kind of place can be fun, because each new proposal you send off
is a new chance to negotiate and that may be the time to add staff and
computer hardware.
Good luck! Arlene